Comparing iRobot Roomba j7 (7150) Wi-Fi Connected Robot Vacuum and iRobot Roomba i3+ EVO (3550) Self-Emptying Robot Vacuum: A Comprehensive Analysis
- אלי זרקובר
- Nov 6, 2024
- 4 min read
Updated: Nov 10, 2024
In today's fast-paced world, keeping our homes clean can feel like a never-ending chore. Fortunately, smart technology has made it easier to maintain cleanliness. Among the options available, iRobot stands out with its range of robotic vacuums. In this post, we’ll compare two notable models: the iRobot Roomba j7 (7150) and the iRobot Roomba i3+ EVO (3550). Both models have impressive features, but they serve different needs. Let’s explore their specifications, features, usability, and performance to help you decide which vacuum fits your lifestyle.
Design and Build Quality
A robotic vacuum's design significantly influences its efficiency and how well it fits into your home.
The iRobot Roomba j7 (7150) features a sleek design that's only 3.4 inches tall. Its diameter of 13.26 inches allows it to navigate easily under furniture. This model comes in various colors, enhancing its aesthetic appeal for modern homes.
In contrast, the iRobot Roomba i3+ EVO (3550) is slightly bulkier, measuring 3.87 inches in height and 13.34 inches in diameter. While it is designed to reach under furniture, the j7's compact design makes it a better choice for tighter spaces. Both models use high-quality materials, ensuring they can withstand regular cleaning.
Cleaning Performance
Cleaning performance is a major factor in selecting a robotic vacuum.
The iRobot Roomba j7 (7150) uses advanced PrecisionVision navigation technology, allowing it to identify and avoid obstacles with ease. It boasts powerful suction, particularly effective at picking up pet hair and debris on both carpets and hard floors. For instance, in independent tests, the j7 picked up 99% of pet hair from a carpet, making it an ideal choice for pet owners. Dual rubber brushes also prevent tangles, a common issue for pet hair. "Take control of your cleaning with the Roomba j7 – smart mapping, obstacle avoidance, and automatic scheduling. Perfect for homes with pets. Order now for hassle-free cleaning!" Amazon: iRobot Roomba j7 (7150)

On the other hand, the iRobot Roomba i3+ EVO (3550) is equipped with a three-stage cleaning system that agitates, brushes, and vacuums dirt. It uses effective mapping technology to clean systematically rather than randomly. It can capture up to 95% of debris from hard floors, making it a solid option for those with mixed flooring. While it lacks the same level of obstacle technology as the j7, it still offers thorough cleaning.
Smart Features and Connectivity
In our tech-driven lives, smart features can significantly improve the usability of a vacuum.
The iRobot Roomba j7 (7150) offers extensive smart capabilities, including compatibility with Google Assistant and Amazon Alexa for convenient voice control. The iRobot Home app allows you to schedule cleanings, view cleaning history, and set virtual barriers to keep the robot out of certain areas. For example, if you’re hosting guests, you can easily direct the vacuum to avoid the dining room.
The iRobot Roomba i3+ EVO (3550) is also compatible with smart home devices and allows for remote operation through the iRobot Home app. It supports voice commands via Alexa and Google Assistant. However, it misses the more advanced obstacle avoidance of the j7. "Effortlessly clean every corner with the iRobot Roomba i3+ EVO – self-empties for up to 60 days, smart maps each room, and works with Alexa. Get yours now at 35% off!" Amazon -iRobot Roomba i3+ EVO (3550)

Self-Emptying Feature
One highlight of the iRobot Roomba i3+ EVO (3550) is its self-emptying base. This feature allows the vacuum to automatically empty its dustbin into a sealed bag after each cleaning session, which holds up to 60 days worth of dirt. This means you can go weeks without needing to check the dustbin. With this feature, users can reduce cleaning tasks by up to 90% over two months.
While the iRobot Roomba j7 (7150) does not come with a self-emptying base, it has a large dustbin. Users with pets might need to empty this bin more frequently, especially since it collects hair and dirt quickly.
Battery Life and Charging
The battery life of a robotic vacuum can impact cleaning sessions and efficiency.
The iRobot Roomba j7 (7150) runs on a lithium-ion battery, providing about 90 minutes of cleaning on a full charge. After the battery drains, it returns to the docking station to recharge and can pick up where it left off. Its performance on high-pile carpets may affect battery life, yet it typically maintains a consistent cleaning performance in average-sized spaces.
Comparatively, the iRobot Roomba i3+ EVO (3550) offers a similar battery life, averaging about 75 to 90 minutes. Like the j7, it automatically returns to its charging station when needed, making both models reliable options for homes of similar sizes.
Evaluating Price and Value
Price impacts any purchase decision when considering a robotic vacuum.
The iRobot Roomba j7 (7150) is generally priced higher due to its advanced features like obstacle detection and customizable cleaning settings. For those who want the latest technology and can manage a higher expense, this model provides excellent value.
The iRobot Roomba i3+ EVO (3550) is more affordably priced, especially for its self-emptying capabilities. This makes it a smart investment for budget-minded consumers looking for efficient cleaning with minimal upkeep.
Final Thoughts
When comparing the iRobot Roomba j7 (7150) and the iRobot Roomba i3+ EVO (3550), the best choice depends on your unique preferences.
If you value advanced features and a compact design, the Roomba j7 may be the better fit for you. On the other hand, if low-maintenance cleaning and affordability are what you seek, the Roomba i3+ EVO shines due to its self-emptying feature.
Both robotic vacuums are capable and efficient, helping to lessen your household chores. By thinking about your cleaning habits and environment, you can choose the model that best matches your needs.
Comments